1/3/2024 0 Comments Cubase 8 vs cubase 9Hi Rotund - Thanks for that very helpful post. I run a small studio where time is definitely a big factor. Time may not be a factor for you if you are working on your own stuff with limitless hours to get things proper. The RND Stuff is my goto when I run out of UAD DSP. Clearly a step up in the “more forgiving” arena. Then I got the Neve RND bundle and that changed things a bit. I ended up having to automate things where as the UAD stuff just took it in stride and sounded great doing it. I kept having to go back and tweak things in the native mix where the dynamics of a particular part of the song would sound pinched or out of control. IMHO, The UAD stuff in general has a much wider sweet spot. At first I thought this was due to just being more familiar with the UAD stuff and knowing it inside and out. It takes me way longer to get in the ballpark with the native stuff. Every once in a while I’ll do a comparison by mixing the same song with only the included options vs only UAD. Since they were distributed by Mackie in fact. Sorry not a lot of url-type detail here, but just to let you know the info you are wondering about is definitely out there. I’ll also add the Pultec EQs, but I’m definitely enjoying the new Cubase “Frequency” plug-in while I try to figure out whether it replaces them or not (I don’t have any UAD-2 Dynamic EQs). I like using the EMT-140, FC 660/670, 1176s, and LA-2A more than the Cubase stock versions, but I can’t speak to that on the basis of any rigorous testing (do I like them because of the distortion they add that Cubase’s don’t have? … or just confirmation bias? … I’d be the last to know until I do a blind test, which I haven’t yet …). I can’t speak to those, as I don’t have them (just the UAD-2 plugs themselves). Having said that, there are other ITB options as well, and for sure there are many vids on line comparing UAD to those. Guy with a beard and maybe a Middle Eastern accent. The powerful Control Room concept seamlessly integrates performer mixes and monitoring setups into your recording and mixing workflow.I recently saw someone comparing Cubase’s plug-ins to UADs, including at least an 1176 and I think one or two others, if you scout around on youtube I think you’ll find it. The 5.1 surround support makes Cubase Pro the first choice in many film studios worldwide. VCA faders and Control Link Groups let you master even complex mixing situations. The state-of-the-art mixing environment in Cubase Pro is unmatched in terms of flexibility, quality and workflow. Edit multiple tracks at once with the smart Track Edit Groups, quantize your recordings with the straight-forward AudioWarp tool set and push your vocal and monophonic audio recordings to perfection with the stunning VariAudio 2.0 audio editing and pitch alteration tool. The many top-of-the-line tools that come with Cubase Pro let you edit and enhance your recordings in the most convenient and efficient way. For countless music producers and audio engineers around the globe, Cubase Pro is the essential tool used when the job needs to get done. Digital Adapters & Miscellaneous Cablesĭesigned to meet the requirements of professional producers, composers and mixing engineers, Steinberg Cubase Pro 9 stands for cutting-edge technology, highly efficient workflows and unlimited possibilities.Acoustic Treatment and Sound Diffuser Panels.Best Selling Microphones - Tube & Solid State.Headset Microphones - Omnidirectional & Cardioid.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |